limitation+&+delimitatio

IN THE NAME OF GOD MEHNOOSH NOROOZI

Limitation & delimitation

Definition of limitation
The limitations of the study are those characteristics of design or methodology that impacted or influenced the application or interpretation of the results of your study. They are the constraints on generalizability and utility of findings that are the result of the ways in which you chose to design the study and/or the method used to establish internal and external validity.

Importance of...
**Always acknowledge a study's limitations.** It is far better for you to identify and acknowledge your study’s limitations than to have them pointed out by your professor and be graded down because you appear to have ignored them. **Keep in mind that acknowledgement of a study's limitations is an opportunity to make suggestions for further research.** If you do connect your study's limitations to suggestions for further research, be sure to explain the ways in which these unanswered questions may become more focused because of your study. **Acknowledgement of a study's limitations also provides you with an opportunity** to demonstrate to your professor that you have thought critically about the research problem, understood the relevant literature published about it, and correctly assessed the methods chosen for studying the problem. A key objective of the research process is not only discovering new knowledge but also to confront assumptions and explore what we don't know. **Claiming limitiations is a subjective process because you must evaluate the impact of those limitations**. Don't just list key weaknesses and the magnitude of a study's limitations. To do so diminishes the validity of your research because it leaves the reader wondering whether, or in what ways, limitation(s) in your study may have impacted the findings and conclusions. Limitations require a critical, overall appraisal and interpretation of their impact.

Descriptions of Possible Limitations
**All studies have limitations**. However, it is important that you restrict your discussion to limitations related to the research problem under investigation. For example, if a meta-analysis of existing literature is not a stated purpose of your research, it should not be discussed as a limitation. **Do not apologize for not addressing issues that you did not promise to investigate in your paper.** Here are examples of limitations you may need to describe and to discuss how they possibly impacted your findings. Descrptions of limitations should be stated in the past tense. Possible Methodological Limitations Possible Limitations of the Researcher
 * ** Sample size ** -- the number of the units of analysis you use in your study is dictated by the type of research problem you are investigating. Note that, if your sample size is too small, it will be difficult to find significant relationships from the data, as statistical tests normally require a larger sample size to ensure a representative distribution of the population and to be considered representative of groups of people to whom results will be generalized or transferred.
 * ** Lack of available and/or reliable data ** -- a lack of data or of reliable data will likely require you to limit the scope of your analysis, the size of your sample, or it can be a significant obstacle in finding a trend and a meaningful relationship. You need to not only describe these limitations but to offer reasons why you believe data is missing or is unreliable. However, don’t just throw up your hands in frustration; use this as an opportunity to describe the need for future research.
 * **Lack**** of prior research studies on the topic ** -- citing prior research studies forms the basis of your literature review and helps lay a foundation for understanding the research problem you are investigating. Depending on the currency or scope of your research topic, there may be little, if any, prior research on your topic. ** Before assuming this to be true, consult with a librarian! ** In cases when a librarian has confirmed that there is a lack of prior research, you may be required to develop an entirely new research typology [for example, using an exploratory rather than an explanatory research design]. Note that this limitiation can serve as an important opportunity to describe the need for further research.
 * ** Measure used to collect the data **-- sometimes it is the case that, after completing your interpretation of the findings, you discover that the way in which you gathered data inhibited your ability to conduct a thorough analysis of the results. For example, you regret not including a specific question in a survey that, in retrospect, could have helped address a particular issue that emerged later in the study. Acknowledge the deficiency by stating a need in future research to revise the specific method for gathering data.
 * ** Self-reported data **-- whether you are relying on pre-existing self-reported data or you are conducting a qualitative research study and gathering the data yourself, self-reported data is limited by the fact that it rarely can be independently verified. In other words, you have to take what people say, whether in interviews, focus groups, or on questionnaries, at face value. However, self-reported data contain several potential sources of bias that should be noted as limitations: (1) selective memory (remembering or not remembering experiences or events that occurred at some point in the past); (2) telescoping [recalling events that occurred at one time as if they occurred at another time]; (3) attribution [the act of attributing positive events and outcomes to one's own agency but attributing negative events and outcomes to external forces]; and, (4) exaggeration [the act of representing outcomes or embelishing events as more significant than is actually suggested from other data].
 * ** Access ** -- if your study depends on having access to people, organizations, or documents and, for whatever reason, access is denied or otherwise limited, the reasons for this need to be described.
 * ** Longitudinal effects **-- unlike your professor, who can literally devote years [even a lifetime] to studying a single research problem, the time available to investigate a research problem and to measure change or stability within a sample is constrained by the due date of your assignment. Be sure to choose a topic that does not require an excessive amount of time to complete the literature review, apply the methodology, and gather and interpret the results. If you're unsure, talk to your professor.
 * ** Cultural and other type of bias ** -- we all have biases, whether we are conscience of them or not. Bias is when a person, place, or thing is viewed or shown in a consistently inaccurate way. It is usually negative, though one can have a positive bias as well. When proof-reading your paper, be especially critical in reviewing how you have stated a problem, selected the data to be studied, what may have been omitted, the manner in which you have ordered events, people, or places and how you have chosen to represent a person, place, or thing, to name a phenomenon, or to use possible words with a positive or negative connotation. Note that if you detect bias in prior research, it must be acknowledged and you should explain what measures were taken to avoid perpetuating bias.
 * ** Fluency in a language ** -- if your research focuses on measuring the perceived value of after-school tutoring among Mexican-American ESL [English as a Second Language] students, for example, and you are not fluent in Spanish, you are limited in being able to read and interpret Spanish language research studies on the topic. This deficiency should be acknowledged.

Structure and Writing Style
**Information about the limitiations of your study are generally placed either at the beginning of the discussion section of your paper** so the reader knows and understands the limitations before reading the rest of your analysis of the findings, or, the limitiations are outlined at the conclusion of the discussion section as an aknowledgement of the need for further study. Statements about a study's limitations should not be buried in the body [middle] of the discussion section unless a limitation is specific to something covered in that part of the paper. If this is the case, though, the limitation should be reiterated at the conclusion of the section. **If you determine that your study is seriously flawed due to important limitations**, such as, an inability to acquire critical data, consider reframing it as a pilot study intended to lay the groundwork for a more complete research study in the future. Be sure, though, to specifically explain the ways that these flaws can be successfully overcome in later studies. **But, do not use this as an excuse for not developing a thorough research paper!** Review the tab in this guide for [|developing a research topic]. If serious limitations exist, it generally indicates a likelihood that your research problem is too narrowly defined or that the issue or event under study is too recent and, thus, very little research has been written about it. If serious limitations do emerge, consult with your professor about possible ways to overcome them or how to reframe your study. **When discussing the limitations of your research, be sure to:** **Remember that the method you chose may be the source of a significant limitation that has emerged during your interpretation of the results** [for example, you didn't ask a particular question in a survey that you later wish you had]. If this is the case, don't panic. Acknowledge it, and explain how applying a different or more robust methodology might address the research problem more effectively in any future study. A underlying goal of scholarly research is not only to prove what works, but to demonstrate what doesn't work or what needs further clarification.
 * <span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 16px;">Describe each limitation in detailed but concise terms;
 * <span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 16px;">Explain why each limitation exists;
 * <span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 16px;">Provide the reasons why each limitation could not be overcome using the method(s) chosen to gather the data [cite to other studies that had similar problems when possible];
 * <span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 16px;">Assess the impact of each limitation in relation to the overall findings and conclusions of your study; and,
 * <span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 16px;">If appropriate, describe how these limitations could point to the need for further research.

[|**Scope and Delimitations**] <span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 16px;">It is important to narrow down your thesis topic and limit the scope of your study. The researcher should inform the reader about limits or coverage of the study. The scope identifies the boundaries of the study in term of subjects, objectives, facilities, area, time frame, and the issues to which the research is focused. <span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 16px;">Sample phrases that help express the scope of the study: //<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 16px;">The coverage of this study……….The study consists of ……..The study covers the ……….This study is focus on…….. // <span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 16px;">The delimitation of the study is delimiting a study by geographic location, age, sex, population traits, population size, or other similar considerations. Delimitation is used to make study better and more feasible and not just for the interest of the researcher. It also identifies the constraints or weaknesses of your study which are not within the control of the researcher. <span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 16px;">Sample phrases that expressed the delimitations of the study//The study does not cover the……The researcher limited this research to……This study is limited to………//

<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 19px;">References:

<span style="color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 16px;">[] <span style="color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 16px;">[] <span style="color: black; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 16px;">/delimitation <span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 16px;">[] <span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 16px;"> and delimitation <span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 16px;">http://www.caslt.org/research/technology2.htm